ABSTRACT
Objective: to study the causes and predictors of mental disorders during the COVID-19 epidemic in those who turned to psychiatrist for the first time, as well as in patients with already diagnosed mental illness. Patients and methods. We examined 100 patients who turned to a psychiatrist due to a deterioration in their mental state during the pandemic, 50 patients were newly diagnosed (Group 1) and 50 with previously diagnosed mental disorders (Group 2). The study was carried out by a clinical method using a specially designed map, followed by statistical processing of the obtained data. Results and discussion. Mental disorders caused by the COVID-19 pandemic more often occurred at a young age, in patients with higher and secondary specialized education, and in single patients. In the 1st group, as a result of exposure to psychogenic factors (the influence of the media, quarantine, economic changes), anxiety (36.8%) and depressive (21.1%) disorders occurred more often, and after the coronavirus infection, depressive disorders were in the first place (54.2%). The 2nd group mostly included patients with endogenous disorders (bipolar affective disorder - 24%, recurrent depressive disorder - 20%, schizophrenia - 20%), which were exacerbated more often as a result of COVID-19, to a lesser extent - psychogenic (experiences associated with a change in material status and illness of relatives). Obsessive-compulsive disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, somatoform disorders have been associated with epidemic factors. Conclusion. The results obtained indicate that there are differences between the mental disorders that first appeared during the pandemic and the exacerbations of the condition in mentally ill patients, which relate to the predictors, causes and clinical manifestations of these disorders.Copyright © 2022 Ima-Press Publishing House. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
Aims: People with psychotic and bipolar disorders were particularly vulnerable to poor mental health and wellbeing in the early phases of the COVID-19 pandemic. However, their subjective experience of what they were most worried about concerning the pandemic, what contributed most to how they were doing, and what they suggest the mental health services could do to improve care during a pandemic, requires investigation. Method(s): Three months after the outbreak of COVID-19, 520 people with psychotic and bipolar disorders responded to an online survey about the pandemic impact on mental health and wellbeing, including three open-ended questions. The material was analysed using thematic analysis. Result(s): The participants' main worries were: fear of the virus itself;fear of protective measures;fear of a completely changed world;fear of social consequences;and fear of poor mental health. These worries involved others as much as themselves. Participants' experience of main positive contributors were: a slower pace of life;more time to reflect;maintaining daily routine;keeping up social contact;and mental health service availability. The most prominent suggestions to improved mental health services were: stay open;be proactive;and individualize treatment. Conclusion(s): In the early stages of the pandemic people with psychotic and bipolar disorders were equally worried about the pandemic consequences for others and the world at large, not just for themselves. Positive contributors to wellbeing included increased calm and time to respite. They suggested that mental health services remain available and flexible during future pandemics.
ABSTRACT
The traditional de novo drug discovery is time consuming, costly and in some instances the drugs will fail to treat the disease which result in a huge loss to the organization. Drug repurposing is an alternative drug discovery process to overcome the limitations of the De novo drug discovery process. Ithelps for the identification of drugs to the rare diseases as well as in the pandemic situationwithin short span of time in a cost-effective way. The underlying principle of drug repurposing is that most of the drugs identified on a primary purpose have shown to treat other diseases also. One such example is Tocilizumab is primarily used for rheumatoid arthritis and it is repurposed to treat cancer and COVID-19. At present, nearly30% of the FDA approved drugs to treat various diseases are repurposed drugs. The drug repurposing is either drug-centric or disease centric and can be studied by using both experimental and in silico studies. The in silico repurpose drug discovery process is more efficient as it screens thousands of compounds from the diverse libraries within few days by various computational methods like Virtual screening, Docking, MD simulations,Machine Learning, Artificial Intelligence, Genome Wide Association Studies (GWAS), etc. with certain limitations.These limitationscan be addressed by effective integration of advanced technologies to identify a novel multi-purpose drug.Copyright © 2023, Association of Biotechnology and Pharmacy. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
Background : Depressive symptoms in middle-aged and older age bipolar disorder (BD) are associated with decreased quality of life and premature mortality. Yet, currently available pharmacological treatments are limited in efficacy. Mind-body interventions have been shown to improve mood, quality of life, and cognition in other adult populations, and may thus provide a promising therapeutic alternative. Here we conduct the first randomized controlled trial (RCT) examining the efficacy of a group Qigong/Tai Chi intervention (QT-BD) for reducing depressive symptoms in middle-aged and older adults with BD. As a further innovation during the COVID pandemic, we used Zoom to deliver the group intervention and active control. Methods : We conducted a virtually-delivered 12-week pilot RCT with 23 patients with BD aged >= 40 comparing a QT-BD intervention versus an active control (light exercise). We assessed depressive symptoms (primary outcome), verbal fluency (secondary outcome), and functioning/quality of life (exploratory outcomes) at baseline and 12-weeks. Results : No statistically significant differences were observed between groups for all outcomes (all p's>0.05). However, non-significant decreases in depressive symptoms were found in the subgroup of participants with baseline MADRS scores ≥10 in the QT-BD intervention only (p=0.07). Limitations : Our sample size was limited and the virtually-delivered format may have limited the positive benefits of face-to-face interventions. Conclusions : This novel pilot study suggests that QT-BD may be a feasible and efficacious intervention for reducing depressive symptoms in middle- and older-aged BD, particularly when baseline MADRS is ≥10, warranting further investigation in larger-scale trials.
ABSTRACT
Psychiatry undergraduate training has been significantly curtailed by the advent of the COVID-19 pandemic. This article examines the use of Shakespeare's Hamlet, especially via the characters of Hamlet and Ophelia, to impart two core skills in psychiatry, namely diagnostic abilities and empathy. Medical students undergoing the psychiatry posting watched Kenneth Branagh's Hamlet online, focusing on identifying psychopathology, forming diagnoses, identifying countertransferences, and developing empathy through acting out close passages. Students were able to identify the features of bipolar disorder in Hamlet, correlating his behavior with separate depressive and manic episodes. They were also able to appreciate the unique quality of dissociation in Ophelia, especially in Act 4 of Hamlet, and recognize it as a manifestation of post-traumatic stress disorder. Through acting out closed passages, students were also able to feel empathy by putting themselves into the shoes of Hamlet and Ophelia. Such a pedagogical approach has additional unexpected utility in view of the COVID-19 pandemic, which has significantly curtailed face-to-face medical education, leading to alternative online methods such as movies and Shakespearean plays in psychiatry education. In conclusion, though online methods cannot fully supplant face-to-face patient contact, they can be crucial tools in times of necessity and allow students to engage in interdisciplinary education, marrying the arts and the humanities.
ABSTRACT
Background: The outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic, the constant transformation of the SARS-COV-2 virus form, exposure to substantial psychosocial stress, environmental change, and isolation have led to the inference that the overall population's mental health could be affected, resulting in an increase in cases of psychosis. Objective(s): We initiated a systematic review to determine the impact of the SARS-COV-2 virus and its long-term effects-in both symptomatic and asymptomatic cases-on people with or without psychosis. We envisioned that this would give us an insight into effective clinical intervention methods for patients with psychosis during and after the pandemic. Method(s): We selected fifteen papers that met our inclusion criteria, i.e., those that considered participants with or without psychiatric illness and exposed to SARS-COV-2 infection, for this review and were retrieved via Google, Google Scholar, MEDLINE, PubMed, and PsychINFO Database. Key Gap: There is a dearth of research in understanding how COVID-19 affects people with or without a prior personal history of psychosis. Result(s): The systematic review summary provides insight into the state of knowledge. Insights from the systematic review have also been reviewed from the salutogenesis model's perspec-tive. There is moderate evidence of new-onset psychosis during the COVID-19 pandemic in which some antipsychotics treated the psychotic symptoms of patients while treating for COVID-19. Suggestions and recommendations are made for preventive and promotive public health strategies. Conclusion(s): The Salutogenesis model and Positive Psychology Interventions (PPI) provide another preventive and promotive public health management approach.Copyright © 2023 Bentham Science Publishers.
ABSTRACT
Objectives: To examine temporal trends of FDA-approved and off-label second-generation antipsychotic (SGA) prescribing for adolescents over time through the Covid-19 pandemic. Method(s): This is a new-user, retrospective longitudinal panel study using electronic health record data from a large, integrated health care system. Outpatient prescription orders for a new SGA (index date) for adolescents (age 10-17 years) during 2013-2021 were analyzed. Prescription orders were linked to diagnoses at time of encounter to examine prescribing behavior. A one-year lookback period was used for baseline inclusion and exclusion criteria, including one-year "washout" of SGAs and continuous insurance enrollment. FDA-approved use was determined by two outpatient diagnoses (one baseline diagnosis and the prescription order diagnosis) for autism, psychotic disorders, bipolar disorders, or Tourette's;the remaining proportion was considered potentially off-label. We report crude annual prescribing rates per 1,000 youths. Result(s): There were 8,145 unique patients with new SGA prescription orders, of which 5,828 (71.6%) had linked diagnoses available. Calendar year 2013 had the highest prescribing rate prior to Covid-19 onset (2.1 per 1,000) but then declined through 2016 (1.7 per 1,000). Prescribing rates in 2020 (2.0 per 1,000) and 2021 (2.2 per 1,000) were higher than those between 2017-2019. Across all study years, SGA prescriptions were mostly off-label and ordered for aripiprazole, quetiapine, or risperidone. The proportion of off-label indications was highest in 2013 (80.1%) and lowest (69.1%) in 2019. Off-label proportions increased again in 2020 (76.1%) and in 2021 (74.1%). At baseline, patients frequently had other psychotropic prescriptions (e.g., antidepressants 63.3%, stimulants 22.9%, and sedatives/hypnotics 20.7%). Conclusion(s): A general decline in SGA prescribing rates among adolescents was observed from 2013 to 2019, but then increased following Covid-19 onset. Despite known safety risks, off-label use of SGAs remains prominent. Future studies are needed to better understand prescribing outside of pediatric professional society guidelines.Copyright © 2023
ABSTRACT
Comprehensive medication management (CMM) is increasingly provided by health care teams through telehealth or hybrid modalities. The purpose of this scoping literature review was to assess the published literature and examine the economic, clinical, and humanistic outcomes of CMM services provided by pharmacists via telehealth or hybrid modalities. This scoping review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis extension for Scoping Reviews. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies were included if they: reported on economic, clinical, or humanistic outcomes;were conducted via telehealth or hybrid modalities;included a pharmacist on their interprofessional team;and evaluated CMM services. The search was conducted between January 1, 2000, and September 28, 2021. The search strategy was adapted for use in Medline (PubMed);Embase;Cochrane;Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature;PsychINFO;International Pharmaceutical s;Scopus;and grey literature. Four reviewers extracted data using a screening tool developed for this study and reviewed for risk of bias. Authors screened 3500 articles, from which 11 studies met the inclusion criteria (9 observational studies, 2 RCTs). In seven studies, clinical outcomes improved with telehealth CMM interventions compared to either usual care, face-to-face CMM, or educational controls, as shown by the statistically significant changes in chronic disease clinical outcomes. Two studies evaluated and found increased patient and provider satisfaction. One study described a source of revenue for a telehealth CMM service. Overall, study results indicate that telehealth CMM services, in select cases, may be associated with improved clinical outcomes, but the methods of the included studies were not homogenous enough to conclude that telehealth or hybrid modalities were superior to in-person CMM. To understand the full impact on the Quadruple Aim, additional research is needed to investigate the financial outcomes of CMM conducted using telehealth or hybrid technologies.Copyright © 2022 Pharmacotherapy Publications, Inc.
ABSTRACT
Objective: to study the causes and predictors of mental disorders during the COVID-19 epidemic in those who turned to psychiatrist for the first time, as well as in patients with already diagnosed mental illness. Patients and methods. We examined 100 patients who turned to a psychiatrist due to a deterioration in their mental state during the pandemic, 50 patients were newly diagnosed (Group 1) and 50 with previously diagnosed mental disorders (Group 2). The study was carried out by a clinical method using a specially designed map, followed by statistical processing of the obtained data. Results and discussion. Mental disorders caused by the COVID-19 pandemic more often occurred at a young age, in patients with higher and secondary specialized education, and in single patients. In the 1st group, as a result of exposure to psychogenic factors (the influence of the media, quarantine, economic changes), anxiety (36.8%) and depressive (21.1%) disorders occurred more often, and after the coronavirus infection, depressive disorders were in the first place (54.2%). The 2nd group mostly included patients with endogenous disorders (bipolar affective disorder - 24%, recurrent depressive disorder - 20%, schizophrenia - 20%), which were exacerbated more often as a result of COVID-19, to a lesser extent - psychogenic (experiences associated with a change in material status and illness of relatives). Obsessive-compulsive disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, somatoform disorders have been associated with epidemic factors. Conclusion. The results obtained indicate that there are differences between the mental disorders that first appeared during the pandemic and the exacerbations of the condition in mentally ill patients, which relate to the predictors, causes and clinical manifestations of these disorders.Copyright © 2022 Ima-Press Publishing House. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
Objective: to study the causes and predictors of mental disorders during the COVID-19 epidemic in those who turned to psychiatrist for the first time, as well as in patients with already diagnosed mental illness. Patients and methods. We examined 100 patients who turned to a psychiatrist due to a deterioration in their mental state during the pandemic, 50 patients were newly diagnosed (Group 1) and 50 with previously diagnosed mental disorders (Group 2). The study was carried out by a clinical method using a specially designed map, followed by statistical processing of the obtained data. Results and discussion. Mental disorders caused by the COVID-19 pandemic more often occurred at a young age, in patients with higher and secondary specialized education, and in single patients. In the 1st group, as a result of exposure to psychogenic factors (the influence of the media, quarantine, economic changes), anxiety (36.8%) and depressive (21.1%) disorders occurred more often, and after the coronavirus infection, depressive disorders were in the first place (54.2%). The 2nd group mostly included patients with endogenous disorders (bipolar affective disorder - 24%, recurrent depressive disorder - 20%, schizophrenia - 20%), which were exacerbated more often as a result of COVID-19, to a lesser extent - psychogenic (experiences associated with a change in material status and illness of relatives). Obsessive-compulsive disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, somatoform disorders have been associated with epidemic factors. Conclusion. The results obtained indicate that there are differences between the mental disorders that first appeared during the pandemic and the exacerbations of the condition in mentally ill patients, which relate to the predictors, causes and clinical manifestations of these disorders.Copyright © 2022 Ima-Press Publishing House. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
COVID-19 is a disease affecting mainly the respiratory system, but the manifestations of the infection can be multi-organs. The effect of this disease on the mental state of patients cannot be neglected. In this case report, we presents the case of a fifteen years old boy who developed manic symptoms after the acute phase of the disease.Copyright © 2023 SOLEN s.r.o.. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
The proceedings contain 47 papers. The topics discussed include: long COVID rehabilitation services, Cardiff and Vale and Cwm Taf Morgannwg University health boards: social return on investment;the clinical meaning of family reported outcome measure (FROM-16) scores: translational research to support holistic clinical practice;patient-centered outcome measure design: the perspectives and preferences of children and young people with life-limiting or life-threatening conditions;co-creation of a patient reported outcome measure for older people with frailty and acute care needs (PROM-OPAC);PROMs: coming of age in lymphoedema services in Wales;ForMi-person-centered planning and outcomes recording app;true colors online mood monitoring in the bipolar disorder research network (BDRN) research program: challenges, benefits and importance of personalization;patient reported outcome measures for rheumatoid arthritis disease activity: using Rasch measurement theory to achieve more meaningful measurement;developing a roadmap towards national collection of electronic patient-reported outcomes for people with chronic kidney disease in the UK;and measuring bereavement support needs in people bereaved during Covid-19;the adaptation and development of a bereavement support needs scale.
ABSTRACT
The following paper described two cases of patients with catatonic depression in bipolar disorder (BD) referred to our electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) service. Both were deemed not medically fit for ECT, and were, instead, treated with intravenous (IV) ketamine. Both responded with a resolution of symptoms, returning to baseline level of functioning. During the COVID-19 pandemic, given the risks associated with providing ECT (an aerosol generating procedure) and, in the context of limited resources, ketamine therapy for catatonia is a potentially beneficial alternative or supportive treatment to ECT that merits additional research.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The main objectives of the current study were to find out the frequencies of Psychiatric disorders in the general population during COVID-19 and to compare the gender-based association between newly diagnosed patients during COVID-19 with already existing psychiatric patients in Peshawar to provide patient care on priority bases. METHODOLOGY: This Cross-sectional design study was carried out in the Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, HMC/MTI, from May to August 2020. Those patients who approached psychiatry OPD through video/audio online calls and could understand and respond to suggestions were included. The bio-data was collected, and DSM-5 criteria were used for diagnosis. Descriptive statistics were used for statistical significance, and the statistical package of social sciences (SPSS-21) was used for analysis and results. RESULTS: The results findings of the current study revealed that 59.3% of the patients approached for telepsychiatry consultation were from the district of Peshawar. Among them, 54% were female, and most patients were young married females (50.7%) with no job outside the home. The finding further revealed that most of the sample affected by psychiatric illness were uneducated (31.3%) and unemployed (28%). Furthermore, in the present findings, 46% of patients were diagnosed with depression, and 12% had Dissociative disorders. CONCLUSION: It is concluded from the present study that in the Covid-19 Pandemic, primarily females who were married with no job description are more vulnerable to psychiatric illness. Furthermore, during Covid-19 mostly cases were reported with depression and dissociative disorders. © 2023, Liaquat University of Medical and Health Sciences.
ABSTRACT
The increased risk of dementia didn't apply to goalkeepers, which is compatible with the hypothesis that repeated head impacts sustained when heading the ball are part of the cause (Lancet doi:10.1016/S2468-2667(23)00027-0). Mental illness and septic shock A nationwide study of 200 000 adults admitted to intensive care units in French hospitals with septic shock reveals that those with severe mental illness (schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, or major depressive disorder) have substantially lower case fatality, assessed at 30, 90, and 365 days after admission, than controls matched for age, sex, and social deprivation. For vascular dementia, the most consistent precursors were an abnormal electrocardiogram, cardiac dysrhythmias, cerebrovascular disease, non-epithelial skin cancer, depression, and hearing loss (Ann Neurol doi:10.1002/ana.26584).
ABSTRACT
SUMMARYFood insecurity occurs when an individual lacks the financial resources to ensure reliable access to sufficient food to meet their dietary, nutritional and social needs. Adults living with mental ill health, particularly severe mental illness, are more likely to experience food insecurity than the general adult population. Despite this, most interventions and policy reforms in recent years have been aimed at children and families, with little regard for other vulnerable groups. Initiating a conversation about access to food can be tricky and assessing for food insecurity does not happen in mental health settings. This article provides an overview of food insecurity and how it relates to mental ill health. With reference to research evidence, the reader will gain an understanding of food insecurity, how it can be assessed and how food-insecure individuals with severe mental illness can be supported. Finally, we make policy recommendations to truly address this driver of health inequality.
ABSTRACT
Background: Increasing reports of manic episodes in patients during acute infection with COVID-19 have been documented since the pandemic began, including individuals without a previous personal or family history of bipolar disorder. As infections and autoimmunity have putative roles in bipolar disorder, we aimed to document the clinical presentations, associated stressors, family aggregation patterns, and brain imaging and electroencephalographic correlates with a series of patients with episodes of mania that emerged shortly after COVID-19 infections. Methods: We obtained all relevant clinical information from 12 patients whose first manic episode started within a month of COVID-19 infection and were treated at Rasool-e-Akram hospital and Iran psychiatric hospital, two tertiary medical centers in Tehran, Iran, in 2021. Results: Patients had a mean age of 44. The interval between the onset of symptoms of COVID and mania ranged between 0 and 28 days (mean: 16.25, median: 14 days); it was observed to be shorter in patients with a family history of mood disorders but not in those receiving corticosteroids. Alongside a descriptive overview of our sample, we provide detailed narrative descriptions of two of the cases for illustrative purposes and discuss our observations in the context of other cases reported elsewhere and the state-of-the-art regarding infectious diseases, COVID-19, and bipolar disorder as reported in previous literature. Conclusion: Our case series documents observational and naturalistic evidence from a dozen of cases of mania in the context of acute COVID-19, which, while limited, calls for analytical research of the phenomenon, and points at a family history of bipolar disorder and the use of corticosteroids as factors for particular focus.
ABSTRACT
Increased delay discounting is evident in bipolar disorder, though there is minimal research on the factors that impact delay discounting in this population. We evaluated neurocognitive correlates of delay discounting among relatively euthymic participants with bipolar disorder (N = 76) with (n = 31) and without (n = 45) past-year substance use disorders. There were no significant differences in the mean delay discounting value between the bipolar disorder group and the comorbid bipolar disorder and past-year substance use disorders group (p = .082, Cohen's d = 0.41). Using multiple regression, we evaluated the most important predictors of the delay discounting value. Impairments in executive functioning (per number of categories completed on the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test) and visuospatial construction (per the Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure Test Copy Raw Score), as well as decreased years of education (all ps < .05), offered the best neurocognitive characterization of increased delay discounting in this sample.